Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195104›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025

Predictive value of

Fadime Demir, Ozan Kandemir, Avcı Guler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fadime DemirDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Kayseri City Health Application and Research Center, Health Sciences University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Ozan KandemirDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sıtkı Kocman University, Mugla, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3978-1222
Avcı GulerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-2984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is known that Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 64 rectal cancer patients who underwent Results: Twenty-five (39%) patients were female and 39 (61%) were male. The median follow-up period was 37.5 months. The mean SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 values were 20.1 ± 9.5 and 7.6 ± 4.8, respectively. OS significantly differed when 8.5 was used as a cut-off for SUVmax2 (p = 006). Conclusion: According to the results of our study, SUVmax2 after neoadjuvant treatment had a significant predictive value for OS in patients with recurrent cancer.

Indexed as

18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucoseneoadjuvant radiotherapypositron emission tomographyrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41195104
PMCPMC12585124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.