Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195102›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025

Radiomics-based decision support tool with ground-glass opacity status of 5-year survival prediction for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Reo Isobe, Daisuke Kawahara, Nobuki Imano, Ikuno Nishibuchi, Yuji Murakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reo IsobeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Daisuke KawaharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuki ImanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ikuno NishibuchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuji MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the predictive performance differences for postoperative 5-year survival risk for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with two image analysis methods based on ground-glass opacity (GGO) status and radiomics analysis. Moreover, we improve the accuracy of stratifying survival risk by combining radiomics with GGO status. Materials and methods: Computed tomography (CT) images for 113 NSCLC patients were analyzed. The patients were divided into four groups according to %GGO step by 25%. The GGO model was built with the optimal cutoff %GGO value to categorize patients into high-risk or low-risk groups. The radiomics features were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression and these were incorporated into the Rad-score model. The combined model was created by integrating the GGO and Rad-score models. The survival rates between these groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, supplemented by log-rank tests. Results: From LASSO-Cox regression, 5 features were selected. Multivariate Cox regression analysis in the Combined model identified GGO and Rad-score as independent predictive factors. The combined model (C-index: 0.664) performed best compared to the GGO model (C-index: 0.521) and the rad-score model (C-index: 0.642). The 5-year survival Kaplan-Meier curves for the rad-score and combined models were also able to stratify the patient population into low-risk and high-risk groups (p-values < 0.05). Conclusion: A combined model, integrating the GGO status and Rad-score may help predict the prognosis of patients with early NSCLC more accurately, with a higher probability of outcome than a GGO model.

Indexed as

nomogramsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41195102
PMCPMC12585117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.