Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195087›Full record

ArticleOpen access journal of contraception2025

Understanding Contraceptive Preferences Across Generations: Insights from Indonesian Millennials and Zillennials.

Syahmida Syahbuddin Arsyad, Laili Rahayuwati, Rahmadewi, Septi Nurhayati, Arga Nugraha, Darojad Nurjono Agung Nugroho, Oktriyanto, Mugia Bayu Rahardja, Yanu Endar Prasetyo, Yanti Astrelina Purba and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access journal of contraception, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Syahmida Syahbuddin ArsyadResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Laili RahayuwatiDepartment of Community Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-3534
RahmadewiResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Septi NurhayatiResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Arga NugrahaDirectorate of Research, Technology and Innovation Measurements and Indicators, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Darojad Nurjono Agung NugrohoRegional Development Planning and Research Agency, Brebes Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia.
OktriyantoResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Mugia Bayu RahardjaResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Yanu Endar PrasetyoResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3382-1131
Yanti Astrelina PurbaResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ruth MeiliannaResearch Centre for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Indra Murty SurbaktiNational Population and Family Planning Board, East Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wahyu UtomoDirectorate of Research, Technology and Innovation Measurements and Indicators, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, Indonesia.
Vira AmeliaFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To find out the differences in the use of contraceptive methods in millennials and zillennials. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional comparative design using secondary data from the National Socio-Economic Survey 2012 and 2022. A total of 31,345 women (2012) and 23,942 women (2022) were included. Generations were defined as follows: Millennials (born 1981-1996) and Zillennials (born 1997-2012). Descriptive statistics, chi-square and multinomial logistic regression were used to assess differences in contraceptive use between the two generations. Results: Age, residence, education, household expenditure, age at first marriage, number of living children, and internet access were significantly associated with contraceptive preferences. Among Millennials, education and internet access were most associated with SARC use. Among Zillennials, education and fewer living children were most associated with SARC use. Regarding traditional methods, among Millennials, age group and internet access were most associated with use, and among Zillennials, residence and education were most associated with traditional method use. Conclusion: Strengthening communication, information dissemination, and education tailored to the characteristics of the generation is essential to address their specific needs and preferences.

Indexed as

contraceptivefamily planninggenerational differencesmillennialzillennial

Identifiers

PMID41195087
PMCPMC12584799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.