Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195064›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals the mechanisms of naringin in ameliorating high-fat diet-induced metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Wenping Sun, Na Xue, Qiang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenping SunSurgery of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Na XueSchool of Basic Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Qiang ZhangUrology Surgery, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Naringin (Nar), the predominant flavonoid in citrus fruits, shows therapeutic potential against metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, its underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive. Methods: In this study, we investigated the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of Nar in a mouse model of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced MASLD using integrated analyses of network pharmacology, molecular docking, hepatic lipidomics, and gut microbiota. Results: Treatment with Nar markedly ameliorated MASLD phenotypes, as evidenced by reduced body and liver weights, lower hepatic triglycerides (TGs), and improved serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Network pharmacology analysis revealed that Nar targets associated with MASLD are primarily enriched in proteins such as SRC, AKT1, STAT3, FOS, ESR1, and NFKB1, which exert their effects through the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Molecular docking simulations further elucidated the interaction mechanisms. Lipidomic analysis revealed that Nar restored hepatic lipid homeostasis, significantly decreasing levels of TGs and diglycerides (DGs), with 20 differentially abundant lipid species identified as potential biomarkers. Additionally, Nar profoundly altered the gut microbial community, promoting the enrichment of beneficial genera including Discussion: Our findings indicate that Nar prevents MASLD by harmonizing hepatic lipid metabolism and modulating the gut microbiome, providing a multifaceted mechanistic insight into its therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

gut microbiotalipid metabolismMASLDnaringinnetwork pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID41195064
PMCPMC12583168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.