ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Leveraging Machine Learning and Real-World Data to Predict Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Simplification in COPD and Its Impact on RADAR Control: Treatment-Burden Reduction, Responder Profile and Structural-Behavioral Trajectories.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting COPD Exacerbations: From Data Mining to Clinical Decision-Making.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Previously, we reported that applying artificial intelligence and natural language processing to electronic health record (EHR) data can identify patients at risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, based on clinical attributes identified in COPDGene. Purpose: Building on these data and using real-world data, we established a predictive model for identifying patients at risk of COPD exacerbations within 24 months of their initial COPD diagnosis. Methods: Structured and unstructured data were obtained from Epic EHR data. Summary statistics for independent variables, including age, gastroesophageal reflux disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, cor pulmonale, asthma, dyspnea, smoking status, number of comorbidities, and blood eosinophil counts, were calculated. Bivariate associations with COPD exacerbations were calculated using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A multivariable prediction model using the flexible machine-learning approach, Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), was then developed. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Of the 3007 patients with COPD as a primary diagnosis, 886 had a COPD exacerbation within 24 months. In the bivariate logistic regression analyses, strong associations (odds ratio >1.5; P <0.05) existed between COPD exacerbation and cor pulmonale, moderate and severe dyspnea, and number of comorbidities (≥4 vs 0). In the BART model, the predictors that were selected most for the branching-tree analyses were eosinophil count, pack years, and moderate dyspnea (in order of most selected). The AUC derived from our BART model was 0.69. Conclusion: Eosinophil count and dyspnea were identified as important predictors of exacerbations. Our data suggest that active monitoring of eosinophil counts and selected patient-reported experiences of dyspnea may identify patients at risk of exacerbations, enabling clinicians to tailor therapies to improve health outcomes among patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.