ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Cross-sectional study of interprofessional collaboration among Japanese nurse practitioners.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-sectional study of interprofessional collaboration among Japanese nurse practitioners.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While interprofessional collaboration is becoming increasingly important, its current status and the competency of nurse practitioners (NPs) to collaborate with multiple professionals in Japan have not been studied. This study aimed to clarify and examine the current status of interprofessional collaboration in the workplace for Japanese NPs and its related factors. Methods: For this cross-sectional study, 760 Japanese NPs who had passed the NP qualification exam conducted by the Japanese Organization NP Faculties were targeted. Data were collected between July and December 2023, using the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II-J (AITCS-II-J), the Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC), and the Workplace Support Scale. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analyses were used for data analysis. Results: Of the 760 targeted, 137 participated, indicating a response rate of 18.0% (100% valid response rate). The AITCS-II-J was associated with the JASSIC and Workplace Support Scale. It was also associated with the JASSIC subscales of "Patient-/Client-/Family-/Community-Centered" and "Facilitation Relationship." The JASSIC was associated with "Informational Support" and "Evaluative Support." Conclusions: These results indicated that NPs' interprofessional collaboration skills and workplace support were the main factors determining collaboration quality. Additionally, informational and evaluative support from superiors was crucial to improve NPs' ability to collaborate with other professionals. To achieve effective interprofessional collaboration, developing advanced clinical and communication skills among NPs is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.