ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Relationship between body mass index-to-thigh circumference ratio and incident hypertension among community-dwelling persons.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between body mass index-to-thigh circumference ratio and incident hypertension among community-dwelling persons.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Relationship between body mass index-to-thigh circumference ratio and incident hypertension among community-dwelling persons.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of hypertension is increasing worldwide. Recent studies have suggested that smaller thighs are a disadvantage for health and survival, but the association of body mass index (BMI) adjusted for thigh circumference (BMI-to-thigh ratio) and hypertension remains uncertain. Methods: This study included 788 men (mean age 69 ± 10 years) and 975 women (mean age 69 ± 10 years) from a rural village. The relationship between BMI-to-thigh ratio and hypertension was examined using both cross-sectional (baseline, Results: Both the cross-sectional and cohort data demonstrated that higher BMI-to-thigh ratios were associated with an increased prevalence and incidence of hypertension. In the cohort data, participants in the fourth quartile (odds ratios [OR]: 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-5.80) and third quartile (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.24-5.20) of the BMI-to-thigh ratio had significantly higher ORs compared with the first quartile. In the cross-sectional data, the optimal BMI-to-thigh ratios cutoff values for predicting hypertension were 51 (sensitivity: 71.1%; specificity: 54.3%) for men and 51 (sensitivity: 65.0%; specificity: 70.6%) for women. In the cohort data, the optimal BMI-to-thigh ratios were 50 (sensitivity: 73.2%; specificity: 52.3%) for men and 47 (sensitivity: 70.9%; specificity: 51.2%) for women. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the BMI-to-thigh ratio is a useful screening tool for incident hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.