ReviewJournal of general and family medicine2025
Patient experience in community pharmacy services: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient health outcomes for evaluation of pharmacist-led primary care: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Individual Perceptions and Self-Care Practices for Abdominal Pain: A Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted in Italian Community Pharmacies.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Relationship of pre-diagnosis pharmacist continuity with patient-reported satisfaction at the first post-diagnosis community pharmacy visit among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional online survey.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- The Japanese version of the perceived service quality scale for community pharmacies: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Patient experience in community pharmacy services: A scoping review.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The role of pharmacists in community settings is expanding, and understanding patient experience- an essential indicator of person-centered care-is crucial for improving pharmacy service quality. However, the extent to which patient experience has been studied in community pharmacies remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to explore the scope of research on patient experience in community pharmacies. Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar with predefined keywords, including "patient-centered," "experience," and "community pharmacy." Results: Of the 121 records identified, 15 studies, published between 2008 and 2024, met the eligibility criteria. These studies were conducted in Australia ( Conclusion: This review emphasizes advancing person-centered care in pharmacy practice, with a growing focus on patient experience in community pharmacies. Future studies should develop and implement patient-reported experience measures tailored to different social contexts to enhance care and service evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.