ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Biomechanical investigations on compression, expansion, and flexion of tubal occluders: a finite element analysis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hydrosalpinx significantly reduces the success rate of embryo implantation no dedicated occlusion currently exists for its treatment. This study introduces a novel shape-memory-based Fallopian tube occluder and systematically evaluates its mechanical performance across designs with varying wire densities. Methods: The proposed occluder features a mesh-based support structure with a symmetrical double-coil configuration, designed to enhance friction and reduce the risk of migration. Three geometric models were developed based on wire density (n): sparse (n = 84), standard (n = 113), and dense (n = 226). Finite element simulations were conducted to assess the mechanical response of each design during crimping, deployment, and bending. Results: In the sparse model, low filament density resulted in incomplete contact with the crimping tool, producing localized stress concentrations at the support and central regions with a maximum strain of 1.88%. The standard model demonstrated improved stress redistribution toward the connection zones and achieved a peak strain of 2.73%, providing reliable radial support while maintaining moderate compliance. The dense model, although free of dominant high-stress regions, exhibited severe localized stress (up to 1569.04 MPa) and a maximum strain of 12.73%, exceeding the superelastic recovery limit of the NiTi alloy. All three designs showed minimal axial shortening and radial recoil (<3%) after deployment, indicating limited post-deployment deformation. Load-displacement analysis revealed that increasing filament density led to higher bending stiffness and reduced flexibility. Conclusion: The sparse occluder offers high flexibility but lacks adequate structural support. In contrast, the dense design suffers from excessive deformation under compression, potentially compromising structural stability. The standard configuration provides an optimal balance between flexibility and support, making it the most promising candidate for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.