Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194978›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Nano-thin amorphous tantalum-coated prosthesis for acetabular bone defect reconstruction:

Chang Chen, Siqi Wu, Ge Chen, Zhong Li, Xiaofei Ma, Fuyou Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chang ChenDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation, Jiangbei Branch of The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Siqi WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Ge ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Zhong LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xiaofei MaDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation, Jiangbei Branch of The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Fuyou WangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation, Jiangbei Branch of The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal reconstruction method for complex bone defects remains controversial. This study aims to introduce the innovative concepts of nano-thin tantalum coating titanium-based prostheses in treating complex acetabular bone defects. Method: Ten minipigs were used for Results: All three types of scaffolds had satisfactory bone in-growth, while TC4 scaffolds still seemed inferior to pure Ta scaffolds and Ta-coated scaffolds in terms of early-stage bone in-growth rate. Totally 3 patients were enrolled in clinical series, with an average follow-up period of 21.7 months. All patients successfully underwent surgery. At the latest follow-up, all patients exhibited significant improvements in pain symptoms (as assessed by VAS) and HHS scores. No severe complications such as infection, prosthesis loosening, or vascular and nerve injuries were observed in any patient. Conclusion:

Indexed as

3D-printed porous TC4 implantacetabular bone defectsclinical effecacymagnetron sputtering (MS)nano-thin amorphous Ta-coatingosseointegration (OI)

Identifiers

PMID41194978
PMCPMC12582917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.