ArticleJRSM cardiovascular disease
Lactulose for prevention of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of global mortality, with post-infarction cardiovascular events significantly contributing to poor outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiome dysbiosis may influence cardiovascular risk through increased intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation. Although lactulose-a prebiotic known to modulate gut microbiota-has shown beneficial effects in experimental models, its impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after AMI remains unclear. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 165 AMI patients hospitalized between 2016 and 2019. Participants were stratified by lactulose use during hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital MACEs. Multivariable logistic regression was used. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia incidence and length of hospital stay. Results: After adjustment for confounders, lactulose use was independently associated with a reduced risk of MACEs (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.95; p = 0.038). The overall incidence of MACEs was 18.2% in the lactulose group versus 30.0% in controls, though this difference was not statistically significant in unadjusted analysis (χ² = 2.41, p = 0.12), likely reflecting limited statistical power. No significant associations were observed for pneumonia (OR = 0.17, p = 0.09) or hospital stay duration (p = 0.60). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, lactulose supplementation was associated with reduced in-hospital cardiovascular events following AMI. However, these preliminary findings require validation in larger prospective studies to establish causality and elucidate underlying gut-mediated mechanisms. If confirmed, lactulose may represent a simple and accessible adjunct therapy in post-infarction care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.