Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194956›Full record

ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025

Impact of High-Protein Enteral Feeding on Skeletal Muscle Mass Changes in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mir Mohammad Miri, Mehran Kouchek, Sara Salarian, Mohammad Sistanizad, Tahereh Sorbi, Reza Eslamian, Seyed Pouzhia Shojaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mir Mohammad MiriDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehran KouchekDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sara SalarianDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad SistanizadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tahereh SorbiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9276-997X
Reza EslamianDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine (Shariati Hospital), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Pouzhia ShojaeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increased protein intake is recommended for critically ill patients to prevent muscle breakdown and weakness. In this study, researchers compared protein delivery and muscle loss in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving high-protein enteral nutrition with those receiving standard care. Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial conducted at a mixed medical-surgical ICU. Mechanically ventilated adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required enteral nutrition (EN) for at least 72 hours were randomized to receive either the intervention (target protein delivery of 1.5 g/kg per day) or standard care (provide 1.0 g/kg/day protein). Ultrasonography measured the muscle thickness of the biceps brachii for assessment at baseline and days 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 after randomization. Adequacy of nutritional support was determined by measuring nitrogen balance (NB) at days 3 and 5 after the intervention. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, and baseline demographic and clinical data were compared between groups using chi-square tests and independent samples t tests. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to analyze longitudinal data, assessing the effects of time, treatment group, and diabetes mellitus on muscle outcomes, while addressing missing data with the Last Observation Carried Forward method. The primary outcomes, changes in muscle mass and mid-upper arm circumference, were compared between treatment groups using independent samples t tests and further evaluated with analysis of covariance models adjusted for covariates. Results: A total of 100 patients were studied in high protein (n = 50) and low protein (n = 50) groups. The mean muscle loss in the high-protein group [mean, -0.06 [95% CI, -0.09 to -0.02)] was significantly lower than the low-protein group [mean, -0.27 [95% CI, -0.34 to -0.22)] ( Conclusion: This study showed that high-protein EN might have positive effects to attenuate the muscle loss and improve the nutritional status of mechanically ventilated ICU admitted patients.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitMuscle LossProteinVentilation

Identifiers

PMID41194956
PMCPMC12584090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.