ReviewMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025
Risk Factors of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence: A Systematic Review.
Review in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Minimally invasive versus burr hole craniostomy for chronic subdural haematoma evacuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and chronic subdural hematoma: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although various factors have been proposed in connection with the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), the results obtained in previous studies have not been consistent. This study was conducted to describe the risk factors for cSDH recurrence, drawing upon the current literature, and to provide an integrative framework that links these factors with underlying biological mechanisms. Methods: In December 2024, a systematic literature search was performed using the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases. The retrieved records were screened against eligibility criteria and selected in 2 stages. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was utilized for bias assessment, and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews) checklist was employed to assess the methodological rigor and reliability of the selected studies and their findings. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 61 studies were retained for the systematic review. The principal risk factors associated with the recurrence of cSDH were elucidated and correlated with underlying pathophysiological processes. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores and elevated postoperative neutrophil counts indicate increased inflammation. The use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents reflects coagulation dysfunction, which raises the risk of rebleeding. Additional factors such as male sex, older age, larger hematoma size, and shorter drainage duration relate to anatomical and clinical vulnerability. Radiological signs, such as high hematoma density and midline shift, support the role of structural brain changes. Comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension, exacerbate vascular fragility, increasing recurrence risk. Early detection, effective postoperative drainage, and higher serum HDL levels contribute to a reduced risk of recurrence. Conclusion: cSDH recurrence results from the complex interplay of biological processes, including inflammation, coagulation dysfunction, and structural brain changes, with clinical risk factors. Recognizing and targeting these integrated pathways is crucial for improving prevention and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.