SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Mind-body therapies for pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with depression: findings from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Depression is one of the most common mental disorders and is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the latest evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effectiveness of mind-body therapies (MBTs) on pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with depression. Methods: A literature search was conducted in five electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). A narrative synthesis of the included studies was conducted. Results: The 12 RCTs provided 21 pieces of evidence involving a total of 1,058 patients with depression. The risk of bias among the included studies ranged from low to high, with 4 studies assessed as low risk, 4 as some concerns, and 4 as high risk. Among the 21 pieces of evidence evaluated, 14 supported the positive impact of MBTs on pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with depression. Conclusion: MBTs have been widely recognized in nursing for their low risk and substantial benefits, and they hold promise as a complementary therapy to improve physiological health outcomes in patients with depression. However, the studies included commonly exhibit potential limitations in terms of intervention materials, adherence, and outcome measures. It is suggested that future research should further examine the existing evidence to strengthen the empirical foundation for incorporating MBTs into nursing care for depression. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251113095.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.