Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194916›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Fundamental and emerging insights into innate and adaptive immunity in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Giovanni Monteleone, Carlo Calisi, Silvia Salvatori, Irene Marafini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cross-Disciplinary Mechanistic Insights in Molecular Medicine.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giovanni MonteleoneGastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Carlo CalisiGastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Silvia SalvatoriGastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Irene MarafiniGastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic and disabling disorders of the gastrointestinal tract of unknown aetiology, in which the pathologic process is triggered by multiple environmental and genetic factors that activate an excessive innate and adaptive immune response against luminal antigens. In recent years, great progress has been made in the identification of factors/mechanisms underlying the amplification of the key immune steps in IBD tissue, and this has facilitated the development of several immune-related biotherapeutic compounds that have largely improved the management of the more severe forms of IBD. However, nearly half of these patients are refractory or intolerant to novel immunotherapeutics, indicating the need for further characterization of the IBD-associated detrimental immune response to develop new therapeutics. In this article, we review the available evidence about the contribution of innate and adaptive immune cells in the development of intestinal tissue damage. We also discuss the more recent findings in the field of IBD-associated immunity, which might help identify novel pathways to be manipulated for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmunity, InnateInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAnimalsEosinophilsHumansLymphocytesNeutrophilsCrohn’s diseasecytokinesIBDmucosal immunologyulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID41194916
PMCPMC12583067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.