Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194913›Full record

ArticleCase reports in psychiatry2025

Clozapine for Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A Case Series Illustrating the Clinical Potentials.

Magnus Roland Balleby, Jacob Bentsen, Jimmi Nielsen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magnus Roland BallebyMental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1031-9494
Jacob BentsenMental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4647-2534
Jimmi NielsenMental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9868-7028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Challenging behaviours (CBs) are common in patients with intellectual disabilities (IDs) and diagnosing an underlying primary psychiatric disorder is often difficult. Even though many respond to non-pharmacological or pharmacological interventions persistent aggressive and self-injurious behaviour occur and no treatment-resistant guideline exists. We aim to present clinical scenarios regarding patients with ID and persistent CB with or without a primary psychiatric disorder where clozapine could be considered. Case Presentation: We present five patients with ID with persistent CB with or without a primary psychiatric disorder treated with clozapine. Four of the five patients responded well to clozapine treatment with markedly decreased CB, and two patients had reduced psychotic- or affective symptoms. Side-effects were mild and manageable. Haematological monitoring was performed with a point-of-care (POC) test device. Conclusions: We show that clozapine can be efficacious in persistent CB and/or treatment-resistant psychiatric symptoms in patients with ID. Monitoring and managing side-effects were possible. Impact and Implications: We suggest that clozapine should be considered in patients with ID regardless of a primary psychiatric disorder when CB does not respond to non-pharmacological and first line pharmacological treatment. It is possible to monitor and manage side-effects with a systematic approach including the use of POC testing.

Indexed as

aggressive behaviourclozapineintellectual disabilitypersistent challenging behaviourpoint-of-care testself-injurious behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41194913
PMCPMC12585794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.