Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194898›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Psychological resilience and music performance anxiety: exploring mediators and sex differences in Chinese choir members.

Hao Du, Yanchang Liu, Jian Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao DuXichang University, Xichang, China.
Yanchang LiuGuangxi Minzu University, Nanning, China.
Jian SunXihua University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music performance anxiety (MPA) is a prevalent psychological challenge that can impair musicians' wellbeing and performance quality. While psychological resilience has been proposed as a protective factor, the mechanisms underlying its association with MPA remain unclear, particularly among choir members. This study examined the direct and indirect relationships between psychological resilience and MPA via performance control sense and pre-performance rumination, and further explored whether these pathways differed by sex. A total of 801 Chinese choir members completed validated measures of psychological resilience, performance control sense, pre-performance rumination, and MPA. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to test mediation effects, and multi-group SEM was used to assess sex differences. Results showed that resilience was negatively associated with MPA both directly and indirectly. Performance control sense emerged as the dominant mediator, accounting for 53.8% of the total effect, while pre-performance rumination accounted for 7.7%. Multi-group analyses indicated significant sex differences: resilience was more strongly linked to reduced rumination in females, the protective effect of control beliefs was stronger among females, and the maladaptive impact of rumination was stronger among males. These findings highlight psychological resilience as a key protective factor in MPA, primarily by enhancing control beliefs and reducing rumination. The study contributes to theoretical understanding of sex-specific mechanisms and suggests practical implications for resilience-based, sex-sensitive interventions in music education and choir practice.

Indexed as

Chinese choirsmusic performance anxietyperformance control sensepre-performance ruminationpsychological resiliencesex differences

Identifiers

PMID41194898
PMCPMC12584046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.