ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Charting the knowledge landscape of mathematics learning disabilities: an analysis of intellectual structure and research frontiers.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mathematical Learning Disabilities (MLD) impact 5-10% of school-age children globally, with associated academic challenges and mental health risks garnering significant societal concern. Investigating scholarly work in this domain enhances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying MLD, informing early intervention strategies. Based on Web of Science data, this study employed CiteSpace for bibliometric visualization analysis of MLD literature, revealing that: (1) Seven European and American scholars form a core group of highly cited authors, and ten foundational papers establishing the field's theoretical framework; (2)The hotspots of research focus on cognitive mechanisms of mathematical disorders, brain-neurological mechanisms, socio-cultural factors, educational strategies; (3)Developmental trajectories demonstrate a cyclical pattern of "theory construction-practice verification-theory optimization." Future MLD research will evolve towards precise diagnosis and comprehensive systematic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.