SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
The effects of biofeedback training on athletes' mental health and performance: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of psychological interventions on competitive anxiety and athletic performance in golfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- The Effect of Different Psychological Interventions on Athletes' Competitive Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence and Psychophysiological Monitoring for Integrated Performance Modeling in Elite Soccer: A Scoping Review of Applications, Evidence Gaps, and Translational Challenges.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Neurofeedback in Football: A Systematic Review of Cognitive, Technical, Physical and Psychological Outcomes.NeuroSci · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biofeedback and neurofeedback are increasingly used in sports psychology, yet their overall effectiveness for athletes' mental health, athletic performance, and cognitive performance remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials across eight databases and performed Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses. Study selection used ASReview with the SAFE rule; full-text screening was done in Covidence; risk of bias followed Cochrane guidance; certainty of evidence was appraised with GRADE. Results: Forty-one studies met inclusion. Pooled effects were statistically significant across domains: mental health µ(SMD)=0.76 (95% CrI 0.44-1.09), athletic performance µ(SMD)=0.88 (0.69-1.05), and cognitive performance µ(SMD)=0.81 (0.48-1.14). Conclusion: Biofeedback and neurofeedback benefit athletes across mental, athletic, and cognitive outcomes. Given heterogeneity and sample sizes, further rigorous trials are warranted to refine the estimates. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration CRD420251015094.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.