ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Comparing the efficacy of teriparatide and bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients undergoing thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bone Optimization for Perioperative Spine Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach at a Single Academic Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study compared the efficacy of teriparatide and bisphosphonates(BPs) in osteoporotic patients who underwent thoracolumbar spinal fusion through a comprehensive meta-analysis of published data from randomized controlled trials and other types of comparative studies. Methods: Major online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, were searched for studies on the efficacy of teriparatide and BPs in patients treated with thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Studies that evaluated bone union conditions and other subjective or objective outcomes were included. The publication period ranged from database inception to June 13, 2025. Results: Ultimately, 6 articles with 329 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with BPs, teriparatide had advantages in terms of improving the bone union rate at both the 6-month and 1-year follow-ups and reducing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the 1-year follow-up. The screw loosening rate, VAS score for low back pain at the 1-year follow-up and ODI score at the 6-month follow-up were not clearly different between the teriparatide and BP groups. Conclusion: In patients undergoing thoracolumbar spinal fusion, compared with BPs, teriparatide clearly promotes bone fusion and improves quality of life, with high safety. However, the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis (six) may have influenced the results in the forest plots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.