ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Early postoperative liver function parameters as predictors of post-hepatectomy liver failure.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early prediction of severe morbidity after liver resection using serum albumin and ALBI-score in a mixed patient cohort.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Elevated Liver Enzymes Can Predict Complications Early After Pancreatic Resection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Use on Postoperative Liver Function and Graft Outcomes in Laparoscopic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication after liver resection and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The current International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definition relies on laboratory values from postoperative day (POD) 5 onwards, which may potentially delay diagnosis and intervention. This study aimed to evaluate whether early postoperative liver function parameters can predict the development of PHLF. Methods: All patients who underwent elective liver resection between April 2019 and May 2023 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were emergency or multivisceral resections and incomplete laboratory data. Bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were measured on POD 1, 3, and 5. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of PHLF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and optimal cutoffs on POD3 were determined using the Youden index. Results: Out of 445 included patients, 38 (8.5%) developed PHLF. Bilirubin, INR, AST, and ALT levels were significantly higher in patients with PHLF from POD 1 onwards. On POD 3, bilirubin ≥1.8 mg/dl (AUC 0.79; sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 62.4%), INR ≥ 1.18 (AUC 0.83; sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 68.8%), AST ≥ 179 U/L (AUC 0.75; sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 74.9%), and ALT ≥ 258 U/L (AUC 0.70; sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 69.8%) demonstrated predictive value. In multivariate analysis, major hepatectomy, bilirubin on POD 3, INR on POD 3, and persistently elevated AST and ALT were confirmed as independent predictors of PHLF. Conclusion: Bilirubin and INR on POD 3 were the strongest independent predictors of PHLF. Elevated AST and ALT on POD 3 were also valuable prognostic indicators. Relying solely on ISGLS criteria from POD 5 onward may therefore delay diagnosis and intervention. Persistently elevated transaminases should be acknowledged as early indicators of liver dysfunction and considered in future revisions of PHLF definitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.