ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Core Stability Exercises and Intrinsic Foot Training on Patients With Flat Foot: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07664332 (Immediate Effects of Plantar Fascia Release Combined With Foot Exercises on Functional Movement Screen Subscores in Young Adults With Pes Planus), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Immediate Effects of Plantar Fascia Release Combined With Foot Exercises on Functional Movement Screen Subscores in Young Adults With Pes Planus: A Randomized Crossover Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Flatfoot, or Pes planus, is a common condition characterized by the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch, leading to instability and balance issues. Strengthening intrinsic foot muscles through short-foot exercises is a widely used rehabilitation approach. Additionally, core stability exercises (CSE) play a crucial role in maintaining musculoskeletal stability, as the core and the foot are anatomically and functionally connected via the superficial back line. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of core stability exercises and intrinsic foot training in individuals with flatfoot. Methods A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 80 participants diagnosed with flatfoot. They were randomly assigned to either the Core Stability Exercise (CSE) group (n=40) or the Intrinsic Foot Training (IFT) group (n=40). The intervention lasted for four weeks, with exercises performed three times per week on alternate days. The primary outcome measure was Normalized Truncated Navicular Height (NTNH), while the secondary outcome measure was the Foot Function Index Questionnaire (FFIQ). Baseline and post-intervention assessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. Results The results indicated significant within-group improvements in NTNH and FFIQ in both groups. In the CSE group, there were significant improvements in NTNH (Z=-5.604, p=0.000) and FFIQ (Z=-5.553, p=0.000). Similarly, the IFT group showed significant changes in NTNH (Z=-5.591, -5.577, p=0.000) and FFIQ (Z=-5.539, p=0.000). However, intergroup comparisons showed no significant differences in NTNH between the two groups (right leg: Z=-0.774, p=0.439; left leg: Z=-0.359, p=0.72). A significant difference in FFIQ (Z=-1.917, p=0.05) was observed, favoring the CSE group, indicating a better functional improvement compared to the IFT group. Conclusion In conclusion, both core stability and intrinsic foot training were effective in improving NTNH and foot function in individuals with flatfoot. However, the CSE group demonstrated a slightly greater improvement in foot function. These findings suggest that both interventions can be beneficial in managing flatfoot and should be incorporated into physiotherapy rehabilitation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.