ReviewCureus2025
A Systematic Review of Mobile Applications to Support Individuals With Cerebral Palsy and Their Caregivers.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to systematically review the effect of mobile applications (apps) in supporting individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and their caregivers. Five databases were searched for articles published between 2013 and 2023. Included studies were original with full available text that assessed the effectiveness of mobile apps to support the daily life of individuals with CP and their caregivers. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Six studies, encompassing 91 individuals with CP, were included. Included studies were mostly experimental (3/6, 50.0%). Predominantly focused on children with CP, the studies covered various areas, such as assistance with speech impairment, intervention mapping with gamification, athletics, relaxation, and educational apps for individuals with CP. Among all, one study focused on caregivers. Out of six studies, two were found to be serious (33.3%), and four (66.7%) had a moderate risk of bias. Quality assessments revealed that grades were low (4/6, 66.7%) and very low quality (2/6, 33.3%). The limited available studies indicate the need for future research on the potential of integrating technological solutions, such as mobile apps, in addressing various facets of management and care of individuals with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.