ArticleCureus2025
Rectal Sleeve for Fecal Diversion in the Management of a Sacrococcygeal Stage IV Pressure Ulcer in a Dementia Patient: A Non-surgical Alternative to Colostomy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure ulcers are a serious and frequent complication in patients with moderate-to-severe limitations in their mobility. Advanced sacral ulcers are particularly susceptible to fecal contamination, which has a negative impact on wound healing. Surgical colostomy is often considered for fecal diversion but carries significant risks. This case presents an innovative, minimally invasive alternative using a rectal sleeve. We report the case of a 67-year-old Caucasian male with Alzheimer's dementia, who presented with a chronic, stage IV sacrococcygeal pressure ulcer measuring 20 × 15 cm. Surgical debridement was performed, followed by the application of a rectal sleeve for fecal diversion. Combined with nutritional optimization and daily wound care, the ulcer showed marked improvement without the need for any surgical intervention. This case highlights the successful use of a rectal sleeve as a non-surgical alternative to colostomy in managing advanced sacral pressure ulcers. The technique allowed effective wound healing and avoided the risks associated with surgical fecal diversion. Further research may validate its broader clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.