Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194773›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Corallivorous Fish Have Reduced Population Sizes and Altered Foraging Behaviour on a Recently Restored Coral Reef.

Timothy A C Lamont, Permas B Maulana, Ines D Lange, Muhammad Rizky Madjid, Andi M A Pratama, Cicilia V Parrangan, Tries B Razak, Nicholas A J Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timothy A C LamontLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0305-6603
Permas B MaulanaMars Sustainable Solutions, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0009-3313-2652
Ines D LangeGeography, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9888-2694
Muhammad Rizky MadjidMars Sustainable Solutions, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0005-3156-1112
Andi M A PratamaMars Sustainable Solutions, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3769-2245
Cicilia V ParranganMars Sustainable Solutions, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0004-2827-6671
Tries B RazakDepartment of Marine Science and Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-9334
Nicholas A J GrahamLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-7467

Funding

Fisheries Society of the British IslesPew Charitable TrustsRoyal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration is a global priority for biodiversity recovery. However, many restoration efforts to date focus only on planting target species, without evaluating the resulting ecosystem-level impacts on community development and trophic networks. For example, most of the world's efforts to restore tropical coral reefs have evaluated only the recovery of coral organisms. Here, we investigate the re-establishment of different trophic groups of reef fishes in response to rapid coral recovery at one of the world's largest coral restoration projects. Within 4-6 years of coral restoration starting, coral cover returned to levels found at nearby healthy reference sites. Many groups of fishes recovered similarly quickly; herbivores, planktivores and omnivores recovered abundances equivalent to reference sites within the same time frame. However, although corallivorous fish abundance on 4-6-year-old restored reefs was significantly higher than on degraded reefs, it remained at just half the abundance of nearby healthy reference sites. Feeding observations demonstrated that across both healthy and restored habitat, the system's most abundant obligate corallivore (the butterflyfish Chaetodon octofasciatus) consistently targeted a small subset of corals-82% of all recorded bites were on just seven coral morphotaxa. Several of these targeted coral morphotaxa were significantly less abundant on restored reefs than on healthy reference sites. Despite reduced availability of these comparatively rare corals on restored reefs, butterflyfish maintained their dietary preferences, meaning that they exhibited a higher dietary selectivity and foraged over areas twice as large compared to healthy reefs. This demonstrates that despite a rapid recovery of coral cover and some fish groups, the reduced recovery rates of slower-growing coral morphotaxa limit the speed at which specialist corallivores can re-establish. Restored coral reefs may regain their coral cover within 5 years, but they will require longer time frames to achieve full trophic networks and ecological complexity.

Indexed as

AnthozoaConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationFeeding BehaviorFishesAnimalsBiodiversityPopulation Densitybutterflyfishcoralcoral reef restorationecosystem restorationfeedingfishmovementselectivitysuccessiontrophic networks

Identifiers

PMID41194773
PMCPMC12590192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.