ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Bionic Hip Prosthesis Designed for Optimized Load Transfer and Initial Stability.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Bionic Hip Prosthesis Designed for Optimized Load Transfer and Initial Stability.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn total hip arthroplasty, the femoral component design requires a trade-off between initial stability and stress shielding. We designed the new bionic hip arthroplasty (BHA) prosthesis with compression and tension screws to mimic compression and tension trabeculae for bionic reconstruction. This prosthesis is designed to reduce stress shielding by mimicking physiological load transfer while ensuring sufficient initial stability for successful bone integration. This study aimed to biomechanically evaluate the initial stability and migration pattern of the BHA prosthesis under dynamic and static loading conditions.
methodsThe BHA prostheses were implanted into ten Sawbones fourth-generation composite non-osteoporotic femurs. In dynamic fatigue testing, the irreversible displacements and migration patterns in vertical and rotational directions were analyzed after 1,000,000 loading cycles. In static failure testing, the failure load of the BHA implanted model was analyzed.
resultsIn dynamic fatigue testing, the irreversible subsidence displacement of the BHA prosthesis was (0.3683 ± 0.1046) mm and the irreversible retroversion displacement was (0.0328 ± 0.0157)°. The irreversible displacements in both vertical and rotational directions stabilized at 100,000 loading cycles. In static failure testing, the failure load of the BHA implanted model was (4485 ± 702) N.
conclusionsThe irreversible subsidence displacement of the BHA prosthesis was below the interface failure threshold of 1.5 mm, and secondary fixation was accomplished at 100,000 loading cycles. The average failure load was approximately 6.4 times body weight, much higher than the daily load range of hip joints. The BHA prosthesis suggests potential for adequate axial initial stability to facilitate bone ingrowth, which is expected to reduce revision rates in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.