ArticleHealth promotion practice2025
Inequities in Social Media Platform Access and Use for Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers, North Carolina, 2023: Implications for Health Promotion.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The quality and reliability of short videos about myocardial infarction on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migrant and seasonal farmworkers ("farmworkers") are a unique population with structural barriers to being reached in health promotion efforts. Social media platforms and communication campaigns are increasingly used in health promotion efforts with farmworkers. However, digital exclusion, sometimes referred to as the digital divide, can limit the reach of social media interventions and campaigns. It is critically important for program planners to know the potential reach of different communications channels. We conducted a secondary analysis of a time-venue convenience sample survey of farmworkers that was fielded in North Carolina (NC) in May-December 2023 at housing and clinic locations. We assessed social media use for seven platforms (Facebook, GroupMe, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, WhatsApp, YouTube), randomizing each participant with internet access to be asked about one platform. We calculated what percentage of farmworkers in NC would likely be missed via each platform based on use of the platform and inconsistent or no internet access. Several social media platforms (WhatsApp, Facebook, YouTube) were widely used by farmworkers in NC. However, use and access were not universal, with even the most used platforms missing approximately 1 in 10 farmworkers who had consistent internet in their housing locations. Considering use of platforms in combination with having no or inconsistent internet access in housing, platforms missed a minimum of approximately 1 in 3 farmworkers. Campaigns and interventions should consider using multiple social media platforms and other channels to maximize reach. Future research is needed to disentangle positive and negative effects of using social media to reach farmworkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.