Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194701›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2025

Genomic tests to guide management of breast cancer in Europe: regulation, reimbursement, adoption, and challenges.

Mark Verrill, Michael Patrick Lux, Joseph Gligorov, Jürgen Geisler, Renata Duchnowska, Beatrix Elsberger, Miguel Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark VerrillNorthern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-1120
Michael Patrick LuxKlinik für Gynäkologie Und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, Frauenklinik St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Kliniken, Paderborn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2781-2178
Joseph GligorovDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tenon Hospital (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9900-6386
Jürgen GeislerDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6239-3856
Renata DuchnowskaDepartment of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9272-3462
Beatrix ElsbergerAberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Breast Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2864-5789
Miguel MartinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9237-3231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of genomic tests such as the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test, into routine clinical practice represents a significant advance in personalized breast cancer care. By supporting more tailored therapeutic decisions, these diagnostics can improve patient outcomes, while reducing risks of undertreatment, overtreatment, and associated side effects. Cost-effectiveness has already been demonstrated in numerous publications. However, for widespread adoption across Europe, four principal challenges must be overcome: regulation, technology assessment, reimbursement, and gaps in real-world evidence. Since May 2022, the European Union In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR) has updated requirements for demonstrating clinical utility and analytical and scientific validity, creating new barriers for manufacturers regarding primary evidence generation. Variability in health technology assessment (HTA) frameworks and reimbursement mechanisms across countries further complicates adoption. Demonstrating real-world benefits of these technologies requires robust, representative data collections, yet current clinical trial evidence often underrepresents certain patient populations, raising equity concerns. Whilst the IVDR will help standardize regulatory requirements, challenges remain in harmonizing evidence standards for HTA and reimbursement. This review explores these barriers using the Oncotype DX® test as an exemplar. Evidence was drawn from targeted literature searches and reviews of regulatory, reimbursement, and gray literature relevant to European healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingGenomicsBiomarkers, TumorCost-Benefit AnalysisEuropeEuropean UnionFemaleHumansPrecision MedicineReimbursement MechanismsTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalBiomarkers, Tumorbreast cancerGenomic testhealth technology assessmentOncotype DXpersonalized medicinereimbursement pathways

Identifiers

PMID41194701
PMCPMC12622331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.