ArticleIntestinal research2025
The impact of the quality improvement program on Clostridioides difficile infection management: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Intestinal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of nosocomial diarrhea. This study aimed to implement a quality improvement program to expedite proper CDI treatment, including discontinuing laxatives and associated antibiotics.
methodsStool test results positive for CDI were automatically sent via text message to the quality improvement team, specialists in CDI management. The quality improvement team played an advisory role in this treatment. The outcome of this study was the competency of CDI treatment within 24 hours of stool test reporting. Competency was investigated using 3 different models: Model 1, initiation of CDI treatment within 24 hours of positive stool test report; Model 2, Model 1 criteria met with no concurrent laxative use; and Model 3, Model 2 criteria met with no concurrent associated antibiotics. Competency rates were compared between pre- and post-intervention periods (1 year each). Analyses were performed for inpatients with CDI.
resultsIn total, 310 inpatients with CDI (129 pre-intervention, 181 post-intervention) were included in this study. The rates of competency for Model 1 (85.3% vs. 95.6%, p= 0.006), Model 2 (81.4% vs. 92.3%, p= 0.004), and Model 3 (35.7% vs. 56.4%, p< 0.001) in the post-intervention group were higher to those in the pre-intervention group.
conclusionsQuality improvement program enhanced the quality of CDI treatment in terms of prompt treatment and discontinuation of concomitant laxatives and associated antibiotics. (cris.nih.go.kr; KCT0005892).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.