ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2025
Advancing Wrist-Worn Accelerometry for Measurement of Infant Motor Behavior.
Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing movement quality in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy utilizing accelerometry: Comparisons with healthy controls.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Advancing Wrist-Worn Accelerometry for Measurement of Infant Motor Behavior.Developmental psychobiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable sensor technology, particularly accelerometry, is an emerging tool to measure infant motor behavior. We evaluated (1) differences and relationships between accelerometry-derived variables in structured versus unstructured contexts and (2) the convergent validity of accelerometer-derived variables with coded motor behavior during structured motor tasks and with caregiver reports of infant motor behavior. Typically developing infants (n = 176, 6 months adjusted age) were evaluated via bilateral wrist-worn accelerometers during structured, laboratory toy play tasks and at home for 2 days, unstructured. Eleven accelerometer variables quantifying duration, intensity, and variability of movement were extracted from each context and analyzed with respect to five variables from the video-coded structured toy play task and caregiver report (Ages and Stages Questionnaire motor subscales). Infants and parents tolerated the devices as indicated by a usable data rate equivalent to the questionnaire response rate. Accelerometry values from the structured context were generally larger than those from the unstructured context, except for the variance variables. Values across the contexts were moderately and consistently related. Accelerometry variables were related to video-coded variables but were only minimally related to caregiver reports of fine motor behavior. Upper limb accelerometry is a feasible, valid addition to the infant motor measurement toolbox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.