Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194494›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Deep learning-based 3D dose reconstruction for intensity modulated radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging devices.

Dong Yang, Jiawei Fan, Yu Wenliang, Jiazhou Wang, Zihan Sun, Weigang Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-8945
Jiawei FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu WenliangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Quzhou People' s Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Jiazhou WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9012-6605
Zihan SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The first affiliated hospital, Zhejiang University school of medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Weigang HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Shanghai Pujiang Programme 23PJD014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeElectronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been used as an in vivo dosimetry method to identify treatment discrepancies by comparing planned and predicted 3D dose. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based framework for reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) patient dose distributions directly from electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images and planning CT, without relying on Monte Carlo simulation or conventional back-projection methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsA Res-UNet architecture was trained using 512 beam fields from 60 head and neck IMRT patients to predict beam-specific dose slices from corresponding EPID images and CT data. For each beam, predicted dose slices were assembled into a 3D volume and summed across all beams to reconstruct the full patient dose. The model was evaluated on 10 independent cases using voxel-wise mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), slice-wise dose difference, 3D gamma analysis (global normalization, 10% low-dose threshold) with criteria of 3%/3 mm, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) comparisons. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

resultsThe model achieved a mean voxel-wise MAE of 0.163 Gy, with over 95% of voxels with MAE < 2 Gy. The average slice-level dose difference was 1.186 Gy, with localized underestimation observed in high-dose gradient regions. The overall global 3D gamma passing rates were 90.67% for the 3%/3 mm criterion. DVH comparisons showed no statistically significant differences for most targets and organs-at-risk, except for D

conclusionThe proposed framework demonstrates the feasibility of fast and patient-specific 3D dose reconstruction using EPID and CT data without complex physical modeling. Under the predefined acceptance criterion (≥95% of voxels with MAE < 2 Gy), 7 out of 10 test cases met the standard. Although high-gradient regions remain challenging and gamma passing rates for the 3%/3 mm criterion were slightly lower than in some prior studies, the method offers sufficient accuracy for many quality assurance applications and provides a foundation for future integration into online adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHead and Neck NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansMonte Carlo MethodOrgans at RiskRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageTomography, X-Ray Computeddeep learning (DL)dose reconstructionelectronic portal imaging device (EPID)patient specific quality assurancetransit dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID41194494
PMCPMC12589810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.