ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Deep learning-based 3D dose reconstruction for intensity modulated radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging devices.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Improving patient treatment accuracy using transit dosimetry with Electronic Portal Imaging Device images and deep learning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based 3D dose reconstruction for intensity modulated radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging devices.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeElectronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been used as an in vivo dosimetry method to identify treatment discrepancies by comparing planned and predicted 3D dose. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based framework for reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) patient dose distributions directly from electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images and planning CT, without relying on Monte Carlo simulation or conventional back-projection methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsA Res-UNet architecture was trained using 512 beam fields from 60 head and neck IMRT patients to predict beam-specific dose slices from corresponding EPID images and CT data. For each beam, predicted dose slices were assembled into a 3D volume and summed across all beams to reconstruct the full patient dose. The model was evaluated on 10 independent cases using voxel-wise mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), slice-wise dose difference, 3D gamma analysis (global normalization, 10% low-dose threshold) with criteria of 3%/3 mm, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) comparisons. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsThe model achieved a mean voxel-wise MAE of 0.163 Gy, with over 95% of voxels with MAE < 2 Gy. The average slice-level dose difference was 1.186 Gy, with localized underestimation observed in high-dose gradient regions. The overall global 3D gamma passing rates were 90.67% for the 3%/3 mm criterion. DVH comparisons showed no statistically significant differences for most targets and organs-at-risk, except for D
conclusionThe proposed framework demonstrates the feasibility of fast and patient-specific 3D dose reconstruction using EPID and CT data without complex physical modeling. Under the predefined acceptance criterion (≥95% of voxels with MAE < 2 Gy), 7 out of 10 test cases met the standard. Although high-gradient regions remain challenging and gamma passing rates for the 3%/3 mm criterion were slightly lower than in some prior studies, the method offers sufficient accuracy for many quality assurance applications and provides a foundation for future integration into online adaptive radiotherapy workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.