ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
α-Synuclein purification significantly impacts seed amplification assay performance and consistency.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- α-Synuclein strain homogeneity in multiple system atrophy subtypes.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomarkers stewardship in parkinsonism: integrating alpha-synuclein seed amplification assays and neurofilament light chain into diagnostic pathways and patient communication.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- A Biological Framework for Parkinson's Disease: Advances in α-Synuclein-Centered Biomarkers and Staging.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- A Systematic Comparison of Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays for Increasing Reproducibility.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Detecting the seeds of Parkinson's disease: the evolution of α‑synuclein seed amplification assay as a clinical biomarker.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Alpha-synuclein seeding amplification assays in Lewy body dementia: a brief review.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
α-Synuclein seed amplification assays are a promising diagnostic tool for synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. Standardized conditions are required to ensure a high degree of inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility when performing these assays. A significant issue that hinders the utility of seed amplification assays is the de novo aggregation propensity of the α-synuclein substrate as well as inter-batch heterogeneity. While much work has focused on determining appropriate seed amplification assay buffer compositions as well as the type and amount of seed used, a robust comparison of α-synuclein substrate purification methods has not been reported. We therefore compared the utility of recombinant α-synuclein purified using four different methods as seed amplification assay substrates across two laboratories. Osmotic shock-purified α-synuclein monomer substrate showed the lowest propensity for de novo aggregation, which translated into being the best substrate for seed amplification assay reactions seeded with α-synuclein preformed fibrils or patient brain homogenates. Furthermore, osmotic shock α-synuclein monomer showed the best inter-batch reproducibility compared to all other substrates tested. As α-synuclein seed amplification assays continue to evolve and move towards adoption in the clinical realm, this work showcases the vital importance of standardizing the production and characterization of recombinant α-synuclein substrate. We encourage the widespread adoption of osmotic shock α-synuclein monomer as the universal substrate for seed amplification assays to maximize intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.