Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194286›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Metabolic syndrome and health-related quality of life: unraveling the role of gender (A SUMS employees cohort-based study).

Fatemeh Rezaei Chegini, Mozhgan Seif, Mohebat Vali, Seyed Jalil Masoumi, Haleh Ghaem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatemeh Rezaei CheginiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Mozhgan SeifDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohebat ValiNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Jalil MasoumiNutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran. sjm@sums.ac.ir.
Haleh GhaemResearch Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. ghaemh@sums.ac.ir.

Funding

Vice-Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 29569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMetabolic syndrome (MetS), beyond its well-established link to the rising tide of chronic conditions, casts a significant shadow on individual's daily well-being, diminishing their Health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study examines the association between MetS and HRQOL with a focus on gender differences among a cohort of healthcare workers.

resultsIn this study, the prevalence of MetS was 9.3%, with a higher prevalence in men (10.3%) than in women (8.5%). Women with MetS reported significantly lower overall HRQOL scores compared to women without MetS (β = -1.89, p< 0.001), while no such association was found in men (β = 0.05, p = 0.922). Additionally, a significant gender-dependent interaction was observed, with a stronger association between MetS and lower physical HRQOL scores in women than in men (β = -3.17 vs. β = -2.17). Findings highlight a gender-specific pattern in the association between MetS and reduced HRQOL, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMetabolic SyndromeQuality of LifeAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSex FactorsGender differencesHealthcare workersHealth-related quality of lifeMetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41194286
PMCPMC12587520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.