ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Attentional bias toward food in binge eating disorder: baseline differences and the limits of attention modification training.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Food-Related Attentional Biases in Restrained Eaters: A Meta-Analysis.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttentional processes toward high-calorie foods contribute to the maintenance of binge eating disorder (BED) and have been targeted by attentional modification trainings (AMTs). In this study, we quantified food-related attentional bias (AB) in individuals with BED versus control groups with normal-weight (NCG) and overweight (OCG), and evaluated whether AMT effects would persist after one week and generalize to novel stimuli.
methodsWe assessed eating pathology and AB in 135 participants (BED: n = 72; NCG: n = 32; OCG: n = 31). We used a dot-probe paradigm with concurrent eye-tracking and reaction-time measures. Sixty-one participants with BED were then randomized to four sessions of AMT or placebo training. All participants with BED underwent re-evaluations of AB and eating pathology one week after the final training session.
resultsAt baseline, the group with BED presented significantly greater AB toward high-calorie food cues than both the NCG and OCG did. One week post-training, no differential effects of AMT were observed: both the AMT and placebo groups showed modest, nonspecific reductions in initial fixation duration bias and reaction-time variability. Correlations between changes in AB toward food and eating pathology were small and not significant.
conclusionsThe presence of a food-related AB in individuals with BED was confirmed. However, AMT did not yield sustained or generalized modifications in attentional processing beyond those observed in the placebo condition. Nonspecific improvements may reflect enhanced overall attentional control or general exposure effects. Future research should isolate the active components of AMT and explore strategies to increase its ecological validity.
trial registrationRegistered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012984) on 2017-11-30.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.