Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194265›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Virtual Reality Is Safe and Can Reduce In-Hospital Anxiety and Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequence Analyses.

Karsten L Lassen, Kristian Hermander, Pether Jildenstål, Nanna Wagner, Annelie Augustinsson, Carina Sjöberg, Anja Geisler

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karsten L LassenDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4633-0772
Kristian HermanderDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3602-7595
Pether JildenstålDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-8915
Nanna WagnerDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1224-9260
Annelie AugustinssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3415-0536
Carina SjöbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-7357
Anja GeislerDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Transplantation and General Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveVirtual reality (VR) is a rapidly evolving technology that is currently utilized in hospital settings for various types of surgical procedures. The extent to which VR is evident in improving patient outcomes is unknown. This systematic review assesses the impact of VR on adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: The following databases were sought: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. All studies published after 2017 were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB2 and ROBINS-I. Meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses were performed, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach for the randomised controlled trials.

resultsA total of 37 full-text studies (n = 3152) were included. VR significantly reduced anxiety measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (p < 0.0001) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (p = 0.008). Furthermore, Numeric Rating Scale pain was significantly reduced (p < 0.00005), with a significantly shorter recovery time and a non-significant improvement in patient satisfaction. Adverse events were infrequent and mild, with no serious adverse events reported. The risk of bias was primarily "some concerns", and the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low.

conclusionsVR appears effective in reducing pain and anxiety in adult patients in an in-hospital setting. It offers a relatively safe adjunct to standard care with minimal side effects. However, heterogeneity in outcomes and the risk of bias suggest a need for more standardised, high-quality trials. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis provides updated evidence that virtual reality can significantly reduce anxiety and pain in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Through combining recent RCTs and cohort studies with robust methodological approaches, this review strengthens the evidence for VR as an effective non-pharmacological intervention. With minimal adverse events and significant improvements in recovery time, VR represents a scalable tool that can strengthen multimodal strategies and promote safer and more comfortable patient experiences.

Indexed as

AnxietyPain ManagementVirtual RealityHumans

Identifiers

PMID41194265
PMCPMC12589719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.