ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Simultaneous population genomics of hosts and their parasites with selective whole genome amplification.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenerating parasite genomes is challenging when little of the DNA in infected host tissue is from the parasite. We used selective whole genome amplification (SWGA) to generate genomic data from wildlife samples of the avian haemosporidian Haemoproteus majoris (lineage PARUS1) and its host, the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus).
methodsWe used SWGA to amplify the parasite DNA in nine avian blood samples collected between 1996 and 2021, and subsequently performed short-read sequencing and bioinformatically separated the host and parasite reads in each sample.
resultsSWGA increased the percentage of parasite reads significantly. Sequencing to a depth of about 56 million reads (forward and reverse) per sample resulted on average (± standard error [SE]) in 11.3X ± 1.85 for the host genome and 1.17X ± 0.446 mean depth of coverage for the host and parasite, respectively, after SWGA. Furthermore, about 74% of the host genome (genome size approx. 1.2 Gb) and 33% of the parasite genome (approx. 23.9 Mb) had at least 1X coverage on average; two samples had 1X coverage of approximately 60% of the parasite genome. Parasite sequencing success was positively correlated with parasitemia. When comparing the parasite sequences in the four best samples, we identified 9895 sites (minimum 5X coverage) that varied among the infections. When filtering the full dataset to at least six samples per variant, we identified 14,512,339 and 7068 sites that varied among samples in the host and parasite populations, respectively, revealing variation among samples and years.
conclusionsSWGA facilitates dual host-parasite population genomics in this system and will greatly expand our understanding of host-parasite interactions over space and time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.