ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A hybrid vision transformer with ensemble CNN framework for cervical cancer diagnosis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast Cancer Knowledge and Screening Barriers Among Female University Students of Pakistan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Improving IoT security through an explainable hybrid CNN-transformer model and federated learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BC-SwinNet: Swin transformer and CNN with multi-objective optimization for multi-class breast cancer detection using Histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model Integrating Ultrasound Images and Multidimensional Clinical Information for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Non-Mass Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Ensemble Transformer Framework for Breast Cancer Detection in Ultrasound Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting tourism growth in Saudi Arabia with machine learning models for vision 2030 perspective.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DeepInsight-Net: a CBAM-enhanced ResNet50 framework with focal loss for robust cervical cancer classification on multi-center datasets.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide, necessitating early and accurate detection methods. This study introduces a hybrid framework utilizing Vision Transformers (ViT) and ensemble learning-based convolutional neural networks (CNN) models for cervical cancer classification based on Pap smear images. Two prominent datasets, Mendeley LBC and SIPaKMeD, are employed, encompassing nine distinct categories of cervical cell abnormalities. The proposed approach integrates pre-trained CNN models of DenseNet201, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2 to extract high-level features, further fused through ensemble learning. These features are then processed by the ViT-based encoder model designed for improved interpretability and accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid model achieves superior accuracy rates of 97.26%, a recall of 97.27%, a precision of 97.27%, and 96.70% for the F1-score on the Mendeley LBC dataset. For the SIPaKMeD dataset, there was an accuracy of 99.18%, a recall of 99.18%, a precision of 99.15%, and a 99.21% F1-score. On the combined dataset, the model outperformed individual pre-trained models with 95.10% accuracy and a 95.01% F1-score. Moreover, the framework incorporates augmentation with Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, specifically Grad-CAM, to provide transparent and interpretable diagnostic outcomes, enhancing its utility in clinical settings. This research underscores the potential of hybrid AI frameworks in revolutionizing cervical cancer diagnostics by offering accurate, efficient, and interpretable solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.