ArticleBMC research notes2025
The mediating role of cognitive schemas in the relationship between parenting styles and suicidal ideation in adolescents: a structural equation modeling approach.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimSuicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for effective prevention. Parenting styles influence early maladaptive cognitive schemas, which in turn may affect suicidal ideation during adolescence. This study investigated the mediating role of cognitive schemas in the relationship between parenting styles and suicidal ideation among students.
methodsThis cross-sectional study employed structural equation modeling (SEM) on data collected from 593 high school and college students aged 12-21 in Shiraz, Iran, during 2020-2021. Participants were recruited through stratified multi-stage random sampling. Sample size was determined based on SEM guidelines and power analysis. Data were gathered using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire, Young's Schema Questionnaire, and Parental Authority Questionnaire. Analyses were conducted using SPSS 22 and MPLUS. SEM examined direct, indirect, and total effects of parenting styles on suicidal ideation via cognitive schemas.
resultsFive models indicated that authoritarian parenting increased suicidal ideation through all early maladaptive schemas: disconnection/rejection (β = 0.184), impaired autonomy/performance (β = 0.115), other-directedness (β = 0.078), over-vigilance/inhibition (β = 0.052), and impaired limits (β = 0.107). Permissive parenting increased suicidal ideation through disconnection/rejection (β = 0.072), impaired autonomy/performance (β = 0.033), over-vigilance/inhibition (β = 0.030), and impaired limits (β = 0.055) schemas. In contrast, authoritative parenting showed a protective effect by reducing disconnection/rejection schema, thus lowering suicidal ideation (β = -0.055).
conclusionsAuthoritarian and permissive parenting styles increase suicidal ideation through maladaptive schemas, while authoritative parenting acts as a protective factor. These findings provide important insights for designing targeted interventions to reduce suicidal ideation among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.