ArticleBMC health services research2025
Building an initial programme theory to explain how and why on-the-day surgery cancellations occur and how they might be reduced.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOn-the-day surgery cancellations (OTDSCs) have been a longstanding global problem, bringing significant suffering to patients and carers, and substantial waste across healthcare systems. Any cancellation of a surgery that occurs for any reason on the day of the scheduled surgery is defined as an OTDSC. Despite the high prevalence of OTDSCs, little is known about why they happen and how to minimise them. This study aimed to develop Initial Program Theories (IPTs) and share valuable insights that can form the basis for future evaluation of OTDSCs.
methodWe conducted a study to address the questions, “How do OTDSCs occur, and in what contexts can they be minimised?“. We used a qualitative and multi-stage approach to developing IPTs. Data collection included OTDSC literature (n = 35) identified from a systematic search, including feedback sessions with administrators (n = 10) from eight NHS trusts, two feedback events with patient expert advisers (n = 6), and expert practitioners (n = 8).
resultsThe iterative analysis found that OTDSCs are a complex undesired outcome, influenced by many interconnected “variables” at macro-level (e.g., waiting-list policies, austerity measures and workforce shortages) and meso-level (e.g., workload, high emergency admissions and interruptions), as well as healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ perceptions and behaviours. The study identified that failures in various aspects of individualised care (such as care planning, communication and resource allocation) in preparing for surgery before admission could also contribute to different types of OTDSCs.
conclusionAs a result of the complex and interconnected nature of OTDSCs and the wide variety of causes, it can be hard to reduce their occurrence. OTDSCs can be minimised by carefully considering various aspects of individualisation of care, such as clinical care planning, communication and resource allocation and delivery when preparing patients to undergo surgery. Providing favourable working conditions and creating effective knowledge transfer between the stakeholders initiating OTDSCs and HCPs who prepare patients for surgery can be critical to minimising most OTDSCs. The study developed a taxonomy and novel IPTs that have practical implications for policymakers and practitioners when designing interventions to minimise OTDSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.