ReviewBiomarker research2025
Harnessing multi-omics approaches to decipher tumor evolution and improve diagnosis and therapy in lung cancer.
Review in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer Heterogeneity and Cancer Cell Plasticity: Molecular Mechanisms and Precision Therapy.MedComm · 2026Review
- The dual role of the crosstalk between autophagy and ferroptosis in lung cancer treatment: Advances in mechanisms and therapeutic strategies (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Integration of blood protein-metabolic profiles via machine learning to enable the accurate early detection of non-small cell lung cancer.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- A new era of precision diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer: artificial intelligence-driven multimodal data integration and clinical applications.Cell death & disease · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in oncology: from data integration to precision cancer care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- From Simple Scores to Intelligent Systems: Encouraging the Development, Validation and Adoption of Robust Prognostic Tools in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advancement of novel technologies such as whole-genome sequencing, single-cell sequencing, and spatial transcriptomics, single-omics analyses have already promoted the research of tumorigenesis as well as development and have partly elucidated the evolutionary processes of lung cancer. However, it is still difficult to distinguish these confounding features via single dimensional approaches due to the complexity, heterogeneity and cell-cell interactions with the immune microenvironment in lung cancer. Multi-omics approaches provide a holistic framework for constructing detailed tumor ecosystem landscapes, thereby facilitating the development of a more robust classification system for precision diagnosis and treatment, and aiding in the discovery of novel cancer biomarkers. In this review, we summarize the potential and applications of multi-omics approaches in characterizing intratumor heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment throughout the course of lung cancer development. By further discussing the discovery and application of diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers across precancerous lesions, early-stage lung cancer, tumor progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance, we outline the current challenges and future prospects of using multi-omics to identify reliable biomarkers. Moreover, we emphasize that integrative multi-omics models hold great promise for elucidating the complex interactions within the lung cancer ecosystem, thereby contributing to improved diagnostic accuracy, optimized therapeutic strategies, and better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.