ArticleBMC medical education2025
The effect of peer-assisted episiotomy repair simulation on anxiety and self-efficacy levels in midwifery students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backroundPerineal injury repair skills should be taught to students in midwifery education. One of these methods is peer-supported simulation training in simulation environments. This study aimed to determine the effect of peer-assisted episiotomy and perineal injury repair simulation on midwifery students' anxiety and self-efficacy.
methodsA pretest-posttest, one-group quasi-experimental design. The study was carried out with 39 third-year midwifery students studying at a foundation university. Episiotomy repair simulation was carried out peer-assisted using sponge and chicken breast. The "Introductory Information Form," the "State-Trait Anxiety Inventory," and the "General Self-Efficacy Scale" were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics and dependent group t-tests were employed to evaluate the difference between the pre-test and post-test.
resultsThe mean age of the students was 21.44 ± 1.68 years (Min = 20; Max = 30). According to the results, there was a significant decrease in the mean scores of the State and Trait Anxiety scales in the pre-and post-simulation periods (Pre: State Anxiety mean 34.41 ± 9.58, Trait Anxiety 44.79 ± 9.57; Post: State Anxiety mean 30.48 ± 9.31, Trait Anxiety 41.33 ± 10.82; p < 0.05). While no difference was observed between the pre-test and post-test in the total score of general self-efficacy (Pre: mean 62.48 ± 9.74; Post: mean 62.59 ± 11.92; p > 0.05) of the students, there was a significant difference in the sub-dimension of Sustaining Effort & Persistence (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrated that peer-assisted episiotomy repair simulation training effectively reduced students' anxiety. It is recommended that peer support be included in pre-clinical episiotomy and perineal injury repair simulation practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.