ArticleBMC medical education2025
Delivery of the TeamSTEPPS
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional collaboration among healthcare teams has become essential to ensuring patient safety. Deficiencies in collaboration and ineffective communication among team members contribute significantly to the risk of patient harm. Communication-related issues are consistently identified as the predominant cause of medical errors across healthcare settings. The aim of the study was to implement the TeamSTEPPS
methodsIn this mixed-method study, the participants completed the TeamSTEPPS
resultsA total of 31 participants participated in the study. The analysis of the T-TPQ scores revealed no statistically significant differences between the pre-test, post-test, and retention test results (p > 0.05). The interview data underwent inductive content analysis, resulting in the identification of four key themes: team cohesion, support, leadership qualities, and communication. The participants' feedback on the TeamSTEPPS
conclusionThis study is significant as it represents the first implementation and evaluation of the TeamSTEPPS
trial registrationClinical trial number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.