Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194117›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) acquisition and molecular characterization following colistin monotherapy and colistin-meropenem combination therapy: findings from the AIDA randomized trial.

Amir Nutman, Elizabeth Temkin, Jonathan Lellouche, Maayan Amar Ben Dalak, Ella Kaplan, Mor Lurie-Weinberger, Yael Dishon Benattar, Ami Neuberger, Anat Stern, Vered Daitch and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01732250 (Multicenter Open-label RCT to Compare Colistin Alone vs. Colistin Plus Meropenem), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01732250 phase4completednot on this map

Multicenter Open-label RCT to Compare Colistin Alone vs. Colistin Plus Meropenem

TypeinterventionalSponsorMical PaulRan2013 to 2017Enrolled406ConditionsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsArmsColistin, Meropenem
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Amir NutmanNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. anutman@gmail.com.
Elizabeth TemkinNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jonathan LelloucheNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Maayan Amar Ben DalakNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ella KaplanNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mor Lurie-WeinbergerNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yael Dishon BenattarInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Ami NeubergerInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Anat SternInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Vered DaitchGray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Noa Eliakim-RazGray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Emanuele Durante-MangoniAORN Dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Mariano BernardoAORN Dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Domenico IossaAORN Dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
George DaikosFirst Department of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, and National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anna SkiadaFirst Department of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, and National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis PavleasIntensive Care Unit, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Lena FribergDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ursula TheuretzbacherCenter for Anti-Infective Agents, Vienna, Austria.
Leonard LeiboviciGray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mical PaulInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Yehuda CarmeliNational Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
AIDA Study Group

Funding

European Commission Grant Health-F3-2011-278348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColistin-carbapenem combination therapy is frequently used for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, but its impact on subsequent acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) requires further investigation. We evaluated the incidence of CRE acquisition and performed molecular characterization of recovered isolates following treatment with colistin-meropenem versus colistin monotherapy.

methodsThis analysis addressed a pre-specified secondary aim of the AIDA multicenter randomized controlled trial, which compared colistin monotherapy to colistin-meropenem combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections at six hospitals in Israel, Greece, and Italy. Rectal swabs were obtained at enrollment and weekly until day 28 or discharge. Swabs were processed centrally by plating onto MacConkey agar supplemented with imipenem to selectively isolate CRE. Recovered colonies were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution. Clinical cultures were obtained as indicated and processed locally, and CRE isolates were sent to the central laboratory for confirmation and characterization. Whole-genome sequencing was used to determine sequence types and resistance genes. Patients were excluded if they had CRE detected at baseline, either by rectal culture or as the index clinical isolate, or if no follow-up rectal cultures were available.

resultsAmong 197 eligible patients (99 colistin; 98 colistin-meropenem), CRE acquisition occurred in 6 (3.0%): 1/99 (1.0%, 95% CI 0.03-5.5%) in the monotherapy arm and 5/98 (5.1%, 95% CI 1.7-11.5%) in the combination arm (p = 0.12). Two patients in the combination arm developed clinical infections caused by CRE (bacteremia and pneumonia); none occurred in the monotherapy arm. Carbapenemase genes were detected in four of the six acquired CRE isolates: one in the monotherapy arm (bla

conclusionsPatients treated with colistin-meropenem had a higher, though not statistically significant, rate of CRE acquisition. Early detection of high-risk CRE clones highlights the need to weigh potential unintended consequences when selecting combination regimens for multidrug-resistant infections.

trial registrationAIDA trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01732250 (submitted 19-11-2012).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeColistinEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsMeropenemAgedCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGreeceHumansIsraelItalyMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsColistinMeropenemAntimicrobial resistanceCarbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE)Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)ColistinColonizationCombination treatmentCRE acquisitionInfectionMeropenemWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41194117
PMCPMC12590854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.