Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41194095›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Multi-Regional deep learning models for identifying dental restorations and prosthesis in panoramic radiographs.

Zohaib Khurshid, Fatima Faridoon, Onanong Chai-U-Dom Silkosessak, Vorapat Trachoo, Maria Waqas, Shehzad Hasan, Thantrira Porntaveetus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zohaib KhurshidDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-7335
Fatima FaridoonFaculty of Computer Science, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Onanong Chai-U-Dom SilkosessakDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Vorapat TrachooDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Maria WaqasDepartment of Computer and Information Systems Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shehzad HasanDepartment of Computer and Information Systems Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Thantrira PorntaveetusCenter for Artificial Intelligence and Innovation (CAII), Chulalongkorn University Implant and Esthetic Center (CUIE), Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. thantrira.p@chula.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-9801

Funding

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University DRF69_005Health Systems Research Institute 68-032, 68-059Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University HEA_FF_68_008_3200_001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study introduces a novel deep learning methodology for the automated detection of a wide range of dental prostheses, including crowns, bridges, and implants, as well as various dental treatments such as fillings, root canal therapies, and endodontic posts.

methodsCritically, our model was trained and validated using a diverse, multi-regional population dataset comprising 2,235 panoramic radiographs sourced from three distinct dental colleges. This diverse dataset enhances the generalizability and robustness of our approach. Our rigorous workflow encompassed dataset preparation, deep learning model selection, comprehensive training and evaluation procedures, and detailed result analysis and interpretation. We evaluated the performance of three state-of-the-art deep learning architectures: You Only Look Once (YOLO)v11, Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN), and Vision Transformer (ViT). Each model was rigorously tested using a standardized protocol involving the division of the dataset into training, validation, and test sets.

resultsOur results demonstrate the superior performance of the ViT model, achieving a remarkable detection accuracy of 94.15%, coupled with a high precision of 94.64% and an F1-score of 93.52%. Interestingly, while ViT excelled in these specific metrics, Faster R-CNN yielded the best mean average precision (mAP) of 82.0% at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.50. This comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different deep learning architectures for this specific task.

conclusionThis research provides compelling evidence supporting the practicality and effectiveness of AI-driven automated dental restoration identification from panoramic radiographs, offering a highly promising and efficient solution for enhancing clinical diagnostic accuracy and streamlining workflows in dental practice. This AI, achieving 94.15% accuracy on diverse panoramic radiographs, automates the detection of numerous dental restorations. It provides compelling evidence for AI's practicality in significantly enhancing diagnostic precision and streamlining clinical workflows, offering a highly efficient tool for modern dental practice and improved patient record management.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDental ProsthesisDental Restoration, PermanentRadiography, PanoramicHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceDeep learning modelsDental implantsDental prosthesisDental restorationsDentistryHealth care accessPanoramic radiography

Identifiers

PMID41194095
PMCPMC12587687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.