ArticleBMC oral health2025
Multi-Regional deep learning models for identifying dental restorations and prosthesis in panoramic radiographs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Its Trust and Translation.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- A narrative review of artificial intelligence in dental imaging: from dataset design to clinical translation.Oral radiology · 2026Review
- 3D reconstruction of the target tooth occlusal surface from a single-view image for root canal surgical navigation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Hybrid Attention-CNN and Vision Transformer Models for Multi-Class Classification of Third-Second Molar Relationships on CBCT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dual Framework for Classification and Detection of Third Molar Impaction in Panoramic Radiographs.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence based prosthetic innovation on dental implants: A database research.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Automated Classification of Enamel Caries from Intraoral Images Using Deep Learning Models: A Diagnostic Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking of deep learning architectures for multiclass histopathological classification of oral epithelial lesions.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study introduces a novel deep learning methodology for the automated detection of a wide range of dental prostheses, including crowns, bridges, and implants, as well as various dental treatments such as fillings, root canal therapies, and endodontic posts.
methodsCritically, our model was trained and validated using a diverse, multi-regional population dataset comprising 2,235 panoramic radiographs sourced from three distinct dental colleges. This diverse dataset enhances the generalizability and robustness of our approach. Our rigorous workflow encompassed dataset preparation, deep learning model selection, comprehensive training and evaluation procedures, and detailed result analysis and interpretation. We evaluated the performance of three state-of-the-art deep learning architectures: You Only Look Once (YOLO)v11, Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN), and Vision Transformer (ViT). Each model was rigorously tested using a standardized protocol involving the division of the dataset into training, validation, and test sets.
resultsOur results demonstrate the superior performance of the ViT model, achieving a remarkable detection accuracy of 94.15%, coupled with a high precision of 94.64% and an F1-score of 93.52%. Interestingly, while ViT excelled in these specific metrics, Faster R-CNN yielded the best mean average precision (mAP) of 82.0% at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.50. This comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different deep learning architectures for this specific task.
conclusionThis research provides compelling evidence supporting the practicality and effectiveness of AI-driven automated dental restoration identification from panoramic radiographs, offering a highly promising and efficient solution for enhancing clinical diagnostic accuracy and streamlining workflows in dental practice. This AI, achieving 94.15% accuracy on diverse panoramic radiographs, automates the detection of numerous dental restorations. It provides compelling evidence for AI's practicality in significantly enhancing diagnostic precision and streamlining clinical workflows, offering a highly efficient tool for modern dental practice and improved patient record management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.