ArticleRespiratory research2025
Incidental radiologic evidence of interstitial lung disease and time to pulmonary evaluation.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial lung diseases (ILD) are relatively rare fibrotic lung diseases that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of ILDs is crucial to improve patient survival. Incidental radiologic findings of interstitial lung disease may provide an opportunity for early diagnosis. We sought to estimate the incidence of incidental interstitial lung disease findings on CT scans ordered for other reasons and quantify the time to pulmonary function test or pulmonary referral.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study performed at a large metropolitan health system, radiology reports from CT scans of the neck, chest, abdomen/pelvis, and coronary arteries of adult patients were reviewed for documentation of ILD findings based on the pre-defined search terms. We also descriptively examined time from CT scan to pulmonary function testing or pulmonology referral. The main outcomes were incidence of ILD findings on CT scans and frequency of follow up testing.
resultsOf the 239,535 scans that were included, there were 25,219 initial scans with ILD findings (10.8%). Of those patients, only 16.1% had pulmonary function testing or pulmonary referral at one year, and 23.9% at 5 years. Follow up testing was more common if interstitial lung disease findings were present on CT chest compared to other scan types. The median time to PFT for all scan types was 59 days and the median time to pulmonary referral was 112 days.
conclusionIn conclusion, incidental findings of interstitial lung disease are common on many different types of CT scans but infrequently lead to follow up pulmonary function testing or referral to a pulmonary specialist. Significant delays in time were noted for pulmonary referrals. This study raises awareness of delay in diagnosing ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.