ArticleBMC primary care2025
General practitioners' acceptability to handle unscheduled visits: a french nationwide cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing demand for emergency department (ED) services has led to overcrowding, impacting the quality and accessibility of healthcare. The objectives were to evaluate how general practitioners (GPs) manage unscheduled visits, including patients redirected from emergency departments and/or medical dispatch centers, and to identify potential barriers to accepting these patients.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey in France from April 2020 to March 2021, utilizing a self-administered, web-based, anonymous pre-tested questionnaire distributed among the members of professional society and social network. The questionnaire was divided into three sections, namely: (1) demographics of GP respondents; (2) current organization for handling unscheduled visits, and (3) potential barriers to implementing dedicated schedule slots for patients redirected from EDs. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate associations between personal and practice characteristics.
resultsA total of 1,317 GPs participated in the survey. The majority were female (59%), aged between 31 and 40 years (43%) and located in semi-rural areas (66%). Overall, 89% reported to allocate specific slots for unscheduled care visits. However, only 16% had their slots open to emergency/dispatch center-referred patients. The majority (83%) of GPs showed no interest in setting aside dedicated slots for ED redirected patients, 62% were against sharing information about their unscheduled visit slots with EDs, and 88% opposed the automatic scheduling of ED patients into their clinics. The main barriers to the implementation of dedicated slots for unscheduled visit were a lack of interest (46%), time constraints (48%), and organizational challenges (9%). GPs with smaller patient bases and those using computerized systems showed greater openness to communicate availability for unscheduled care.
conclusionMost French GPs surveyed, representing approximatively 2% of the overall French GP population, integrate daily slots for unscheduled visits into their practice but they are typically reserved for their existing patient base. The survey further revealed that two-thirds of these GPs are unwilling to communicate the availability of these slots to EDs. Additionally, an even larger proportion would refuse to allow automatic scheduling of ED patients into their clinics if redirection strategies were implemented at their local hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.