ArticleBMC genomics2025
Genomic insights into the ecological versatility of Tetracladium spp.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Polyhydroxyalkanoate degradation in soils: mechanisms, controls, biological responses, and knowledge gaps.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTetracladium spp. represent a group of fungi that inhabit various ecological niches, including soil and aquatic environments, where they are considered to have a saprotrophic lifestyle and within plant roots as endophytes. To date, a lack of sequenced Tetracladium spp. genomes has inhibited our understanding of their metabolic potential and ecological interactions. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the genetic differences between aquatic saprotrophic and endophytic strains of Tetracladium spp. by sequencing and analysing the genomes of T. maxilliforme (isolated from Brassica napus roots) and T. marchalianum (isolated from freshwater), alongside 41 publicly available saprotrophic and endophytic Ascomycetes.
resultsGenomic sequencing revealed that T. maxilliforme possesses a genome size of 35.5 Mbp with 9657 predicted genes, while T. marchalianum has a genome size of 33.2 Mbp with 15,230 predicted genes. Our analyses primarily focused on carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). Both genomes possessed the full range of enzymatic machinery for cellulose degradation, as well as the complete repertoire of genes necessary to degrade plant cell walls. Notably, the genomes lacked essential enzymes for lignin degradation or modification. Furthermore, we observed a complete repertoire of known fungal chitin-degrading enzymes in both genomes, which might be related to potential interactions with other fungi. Enzyme composition profiles revealed distinct groupings, with T. maxilliforme primarily clustering with endophytic or ecologically versatile species, while T. marchalianum was predominantly associated with saprotrophic species. We also identified secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in both genomes, including several that showed high homology to those of known bioactive compounds.
conclusionsIn summary, our findings offer valuable insights into the genomic adaptations of Tetracladium spp. to various ecological niches, highlighting their enzymatic capabilities for carbohydrate degradation and potential interactions within fungal communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.