ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
A methodology for developing dermatological datasets: lessons from retrospective data collection for AI-based applications.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe integration of artificial intelligence into dermatological research has underscored the need for robust and well-structured dermatological datasets. However, these datasets vary widely in their development processes, and there is currently no standard methodology to create such datasets. This work identifies three pressing needs for the building of dermatological datasets focus on skin tumor classification: the need for multimodal datasets, the definition of minimum metadata requirements, and the inclusion of underrepresented populations to address the scarcity of health data.
methodsWe propose a practical methodology to create dermatological datasets from clinical records, incorporating both images and patient metadata. The process consists of four key stages: getting the institutional review board approval and analysis of clinical information sources, data recording and structuring, processing of clinical data and images, and quality assessment. This methodology was derived from hands-on experience in building two datasets from Chilean and Mexican populations, respectively.
resultsThe methodology allows the creation of well-structured datasets by simplifying data organization and enabling replication. Each step includes practical guidance for dealing with typical challenges, such as image metadata categorization and technical validation by dermatologists and computer scientists.
conclusionOur contribution offers a reproducible, scalable, and interdisciplinary framework for creating dermatological datasets, especially useful for countries initiating dataset creation. In addition to the methodological proposal, we highlight common pitfalls and offer recommendations to mitigate them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.