Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193942›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026

The Financial Sustainability of Programs to Initiate Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Emergency Department Settings.

Dominic Hodgkin, Cindy Parks Thomas, Margot T Davis, Jennifer J Wicks, Shelly F Greenfield, Zachary F Meisel, Constance M Horgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Financial Sustainability of Programs to Initiate Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Emergency Department Settings.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominic HodgkinHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-9176
Cindy Parks ThomasHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-1196
Margot T DavisHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer J WicksHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0887-8611
Shelly F GreenfieldHarvard Medical School and McLean Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Zachary F MeiselPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and the Center for Health Economics of Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorder, HCV, and HIV, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Constance M HorganHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Research Support CoreP30DA035772 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Haiden A Huskamp, SHARON REIF · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US is experiencing an epidemic of opioid misuse and mortality. Effective treatments are available, including medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD), but they are greatly underused due to a variety of barriers. In response, some US hospitals have established programs to identify emergency department (ED) patients with opioid use disorders (OUD) and begin treatment with MOUD ("ED induction"). For this model to be widely adopted, financial sustainability for hospitals is critical. Little is known about the financial aspects of ED-based treatment models, including insurance billing and reimbursement.

objectivesOur study addressed the following questions about ED-based induction of OUD treatment: (1) Which components of this model are billable to insurers? (2) How do hospitals fund the components that are not billable? (3) Does ED-based induction generate savings that could help fund that service?

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study, involving semi-structured interviews with officials at selected US hospitals. Potential interviewees were identified using a snowball sampling approach. We conducted 12 interviews across 10 states, mostly with urban teaching hospitals.

resultsKey findings include, (1) medication costs are often billable to insurers, but costs of key para-professional staff like peer navigators are not, requiring the hospital to absorb their salaries. Even some billable costs are reimbursed at low rates which challenge sustainability. (2) To fund non-billable components, hospitals typically rely on time-limited grant funding, including the federal 340B drug rebate program. (3) Several interviewees anticipated cost savings to their hospitals from reduced use of ED services by patients who had no (or low-paying) insurance. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that some hospitals are able to sustain ED-based induction of MOUD using time-limited grant funding. However, wider dissemination of this model will likely require more stable funding streams, such as Medicaid reimbursement, paying adequate rates, and coverage of personnel.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersHumansQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41193942
PMCPMC12744767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.