ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2025
A combined in-silico and in-vitro evaluation of cyanoacrylate-based dental materials as an adhesive for applications in prosthodontics: molecular docking and cytocompatibility analysis.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study combined in-silico molecular docking with in-vitro cytocompatibility testing to evaluate the safety of cyanoacrylate adhesives. Molecular docking was performed for four cyanoacrylate monomers (ethyl, n-butyl, isoamyl, and 2-octyl) against key proteins associated with inflammation (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), bone metabolism (BMP4), and tissue repair (NOTCH2, fibronectin). Docking scores and binding residues were analyzed using PyRx and BIOVIA Discovery Studio. Degradation products (formaldehyde, ethyl-2-cyanoacetate) were also evaluated. In-vitro cytocompatibility of isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate was assessed on 3T3-L1 fibroblasts using MTT and LDH assays at concentrations of 25-200 μg/mL over 24 and 48 h. Docking scores ranged from -4 to -6 kcal/mol, suggesting weak to moderate binding and low likelihood of interference with protein function. Longer-chain cyanoacrylates showed weaker binding compared to ethyl cyanoacrylate, indicating more favorable stability and lower toxicity. Degradation products demonstrated reduced binding, though ethyl-2-cyanoacetate showed comparatively higher affinities than formaldehyde. In-vitro assays revealed cell viabilities above the ISO 10993-5 threshold at clinically relevant concentrations, with mild cytotoxicity only at higher concentrations and longer exposures. The combined findings provide a molecular and cellular basis for their clinical use, suggesting that longer-chain cyanoacrylates are likely safer adhesives for denture applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.